-
I also voted to wait a season, and the reason is simple - everyone built their current rosters with the expectation of one set of rules. I turned down trade offers for EE just because I needed him as my sacrificial lamb in the vote-off.
Caimans 🐊 on
September 21, 2012 11:24 AM
-
I wouldn't mind hearing some reasoning behind Chiefs thoughts rather than just knowing which way he voted. It seems that EP is the only one who is stating a reason as to WHY he wants 2013-2014
-
Amen chicago
-
So basically it IS getting implemented, and if two of the four outstanding votes are against, then it will be implemented in 2013.
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 21, 2012 10:50 AM
-
I'm not necessarily a fan of this change. If we do it, it shouldn't be implemented until 2014.
-
Waiting on four for timing (Chiefs, Joes, Durham, MoPain), currently 5 to 3 in favor of implementing THIS season.
-
Still waiting on two votes (Chiefs, Joes) for the system change (though it is already 9 to 1 in favor of switching)
-
Yeah I just saw Erasmo Ramirez was added in another league for $4
-
Right, so what's the vote status, and did we ever find out when arbitration voting is set to occur?
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 21, 2012 9:47 AM
-
Fister/Erasmo/Kuroda/Medlen....that could be bargain basement rotation for the ages.
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 21, 2012 9:46 AM
-
I'm paying Erasmo Ramirez four times as much as my next-highest-paid starting pitcher. In case you're scoring at home.
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 21, 2012 9:45 AM
-
Nate, where do we stand in the voting tally?
-
Umm, wow. That could've been a difference maker actually. Brutal.
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 21, 2012 8:46 AM
-
Should fire my coach.
Caimans 🐊 on
September 21, 2012 12:20 AM
-
Left another 50 between EE, J Upton, and Craig. That 170 points might've helped.
Caimans 🐊 on
September 21, 2012 12:20 AM
-
Speaking of setting lineups, I thought I did so today but must not have hit submit. 120 points on my bench between Price, Bucholz, and Garcia. Brilliant way to make a comeback.
Caimans 🐊 on
September 21, 2012 12:19 AM
-
I'm still kinda trying, but honestly most of my attention has been turned to football. I have at least been setting lineups, but I think the writings been on the wall for a month now at least.
Caimans 🐊 on
September 21, 2012 12:18 AM
-
I can ask for more: vote in the flippin poll already.
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 20, 2012 7:18 PM
-
For serious? Oh SHIT.
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 20, 2012 7:17 PM
-
There's money for 2nd place finish too...
-
No lead changes coming from me because I quit trying to win weeks ago.
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 20, 2012 6:58 PM
-
I think Ottoneu is now officially my favorite format; this is one of the best leagues I've ever been a part of. Great active, knowledgeable owners. Can't ask for more.
-
3 weeks ago if you would've told me I'd be up by 400+ with two weeks to go I would've laughed at you. Knights haven't quit one bit but neither has my team. We saw lots of lead changes during the season, so surprised not to see more in Sept too
-
doh
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 20, 2012 5:55 PM
-
As far as I can tell, nothing has changed since this time yesterday.
-
Oh no....what I typed was so confusing, anyone should have questioned it...thanks for clarifying
-
How many have voted so far? Each time I click the link it thinks I want to vote again
-
Ah, my bad, read it wrong!
-
That's basically what I was trying to say....I think the 2012 vs 2013 vote needs to be simple majority one way or the other
-
The problem with requiring the 8 votes in deciding 2012 or 2013 is that there is no status quo to fall back on if it goes 7-5 either way.
-
Or we could just have simple majority for new territory and super majority for ammendments
-
The thing is, since we have agreed to move to the new system, we HAVE to decide 2012 or 2013 by 8 votes. Just because 2012 isnt a majority shouldn't mean that 2013 is the default. This isn't about an ammendment...this is new territory
-
I agree with WAR...let's see how the voting shakes out and that way if we don't have a strong majority, we can finish arguing/discussing with plenty of time for another vote if needed
-
I'm all for calming down with the voting, but I also don't think it's a decision that requires extended deliberation. Let's wrap this thing up fellas.
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 20, 2012 11:12 AM
-
You can seriously vote in the same poll more than once? I feel like I'm missing something here.
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 20, 2012 8:19 AM
-
lol
Eckfords ⚾ on
September 20, 2012 8:19 AM
-
Crying is right. Everyone calm down with the voting.
-
Not trying to be a dick, but maybe patience, instead of voting again, is warranted?
-
i voted. possibly a second time check the results
Caimans 🐊 on
September 19, 2012 11:03 PM
-
i voted
-
i voted
-
i voted.
-
i voted.
-
out of curiousity, how many people have voted on the new poll? If I check, it is asking me to vote again and I dont want to throw things off
-
I'm saving up for you Wood. Once it's the "off" season...it's on
-
Can someone send me a trade proposal...a halfway decent one? I miss it
-
No
-
Aw thanks, Horse, you're getting me that for Christmas right?
-
Marcus, did you vote in the first poll? I thought we had all 12 votes in on that one?
-
I have not voted yet. Been extremely busy and haven't been able to read the proposed change in order to make an educated vote.
Previous 50 messages |
Next 50 messages