-
Hittin Ugly Finders 's trade block has been updated!
-
Cienfuegos Elefantes's trade block has been updated!
-
Fifty Shades of Sonny Gray's trade block has been updated!
-
Hey guys wanted to let you know I'm running to be the next commissioner at end of year. 50 said we could vote to replace the commish so I'm running
The Harvest on
June 3, 2019 10:07 AM
-
Solid pitching day you had there 50 Shades...
-
Wow the moose got hurt.
The Harvest on
June 1, 2019 11:51 PM
-
The Bad News Bears's trade block has been updated!
-
The Mighty Steeds's trade block has been updated!
-
Fifty Shades of Sonny Gray's trade block has been updated!
-
Honestly I've had more fun watching the past week than last year's title run
-
Yep being in 10th place you know it all
The Harvest on
May 29, 2019 6:00 PM
-
All the excitement I could have hoped for down here in 10th
-
You are the master Mighty Steeds
-
Why not degrom for meadows. Degrom was crush e on 5/17/19 so your statement is illogical.
The Harvest on
May 29, 2019 2:57 PM
-
Can't help myself... how's everyone doing 1 week later on the Paddack for Meadows debacle?
-
🔥Hell's Replacement Players🔥's trade block has been updated!
Crone Zone on
May 28, 2019 8:48 PM
-
The Mighty Steeds's trade block has been updated!
-
I need to move Donaldson or Encarnacion looking 2020 already. Darvish and Price as well
-
Thanks for finding that. Pretty cool to look back at some of the huge trades people made.
-
If you check, wow, yes, $90 loaned, and a bunch of big wheels too. But on the return, a $1 baby Mookie Betts. Awesome deal.
Crone Zone on
May 19, 2019 10:27 PM
-
The trade Jamie was referencing, if you are interesd: https://ottoneu.fangraphs.com/456/viewtrade?id=9392&pending=1
Crone Zone on
May 19, 2019 10:26 PM
-
Yes, I've seen that message. That's in all of our inboxes under the search term 'Jamie'
But the way I see it: That there was a dump trade an spirited debate ensued. And there was a vote. If you look at the date of the email, and then the trade in question, it wasn't that bad, and it narrowly passed, I believe. It's in the trade history on or just before Jamie's note.
Crone Zone on
May 19, 2019 5:28 PM
-
There you go guys, thus reason for my concern. Told I dont make up
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 5:24 PM
-
plus the fact we've had 3 guys recently leave. So I'm writing to ask you to take a look and vote on the trade. One way or another. I'm not suggesting you should vote either way, but I think it's best if we atleast get 10 votes either way rather than 5 vetoes with 5 inactive votes. Thanks Jamie
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 5:24 PM
-
Hello. We have another big-topic trade that some see very unbalanced, in part due to one team sending $90 so the other can afford all the star players he receives. I'd really like to avoid more issues in this regard right now after last weeks fiasco, plus the fact we've had 3 guys recently leave. So I'm writing to ask you to take a look and vote on the trade. One way or another. I'm not suggesting you should vote either way, but I think it's best if we atleast get 10 votes either way rather than
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 5:23 PM
-
Good conversations today. Happy to see different opinions being shared without (much) name calling.
-
I'm done with putting my 2 cents in. Have a great year everyone.
-
Anything sorry
-
Everything on this year?
-
Happy to share when im at my PC. Cant cut and paste on a phone
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 4:59 PM
-
Every year and every league has one or two questionable trades. This league isn't unique. In my opinion this league has been really good about everything. I have no problem with someone voicing their opinion on stuff..(trades..drops..ect) . I'd like to see the proof ok. Batz. If anything funny is going on I think everyone should know...withholding proof is like being involved
-
I want to publicly apologize for the veiled insult I posted, directed at eric, a moment ago. I'm Canadian. We're supposed to be better than that. It was beneath me and I would like to take it back.
Crone Zone on
May 19, 2019 4:52 PM
-
Based on the history of the league I'm not the first to voice concern. I have proof
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 4:44 PM
-
What are opinions like again?
Opinions are like Astros, there are billions of stars in the sky.
Crone Zone on
May 19, 2019 4:28 PM
-
It's called an opinion hells.
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 4:25 PM
-
I always value pitching more. Just look at most trading blocks......wanted SP's. I valued hitters alot more the for the two years in this league....didnt win. But thats just me
-
I'm a guy who stands to be affected by this deal, unlike you, and I'm not bothered by it. Just relax. No one traded Mike Trout for salary relief (yet). This is ottoneu, it's built on trading and building relationships in order to be able to make those trades.
Crone Zone on
May 19, 2019 4:24 PM
-
Eric, haven't you stirred up enough $h!t in this league? Like honestly, just give it a rest and try to enjoy the season. I know I'd personally like you to consider abandoning your team at year's end.
Crone Zone on
May 19, 2019 4:22 PM
-
Never said that. Fact he send loan also is the issue. I read some owners had a major issue a few years ago with same situation. Why send salary
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 4:22 PM
-
1.99 era .75 whip that's top t in nl
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 4:19 PM
-
Lmao didnt this guy say he would have understood if it was just Marte for Meadows and salary relief?? That would be a complete ass ramming of a trade
-
Wait, my logic is insane yet you just called Paddack a top 5 SP? He’s not even close by total points or PPI.
-
Marte at $20 isn't very appealling to me, I dont know why the heck that would be vetoed.
-
I'm glad the guys involved have weighed in.
This is ottoneu. It's built for dump trades just like this. Paddack is a pitcher and inherently volitile as such. Meadows is a better hitter than Paddack is pitcher. And when building a core, one should always centre on bats first and add pitching at the moment you're able to contend.
Thanks fo speaking for yourselves guys. I hope this goes through.
Crone Zone on
May 19, 2019 4:12 PM
-
Both trade partners logic is insane. Dont believe there is collusion but their reasoning for the trade opens up minds. So.suspects gets a top 5 pitcher and marte for a good hitter. To call meadows top 5 is obsurd and just a reason to push thr deal through.
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 4:11 PM
-
I dont think that's an accurate assessment of Paddack... but I understand the logic.
I just don't think the veto should be used to correct trades like this. Not fair to the accepting team, and not fair to let the offering team off the hook. In Steed's opinion, he got the best player in the trade, but he probably realizes he could have given up less to do so.
I won't quit the league if it is veto'd, but I doubt I will be voting to veto.
-
Everyone on the pro-veto train is being ridiculous. Paddack's MLB track record is literally a month and change. Meanwhile Marte is a low power-low OBP guy on the wrong side of 30, while Meadows is showing top-5 overall caliber upside. And Musial's point stands Batzuek. You can't complain about trades when you refuse to partake. You alone have caused more BS than all of the teams combined over my past 2+ years in the league.
-
Of course its not veto to you since you made the deal. Paddock has been highly regarded for a few years and is proving it. Pretty fishy IMO
The Harvest on
May 19, 2019 4:00 PM
-
Also, if you’re going to refuse to trade with half the league on “principle”, remember that will throw off trade values. Feel free to veto this, but if you do please have a defensible reason other than “this seems off to me.” For example, even though Martes salary might be keepable, he’ll likely be a cut for me since I am already over the cap with loans. So Steeds will probably have the option of bidding on him next year.
-
Meadows has outscored Marte by 80 points while playing 2/3 of the games he’s played. Also remember Meadows is a former top prospect who looks like he finally remembered how to hit. So I got a middle of the pack OF and a SP with virtually no track record for a top prospect who’s raking. This certainly doesn’t seem veto-able to me.
Previous 50 messages |
Next 50 messages