-
Blah, my team really faded down the stretch. Also proved that points in the bank are probably worth more.
Citi Slickers on
October 5, 2012 10:25 AM
-
congrats WAR, thought i could catch up, my april just wasn't good and i didn't understand the limits at first. next year!
-
And never mind, it appears we have someone joining to fill that spot already.
Royal(s) Mess on
October 2, 2012 3:18 PM
-
I'm running one and we appear to have an open team going into our second season. It is the 11th place team but If there is interest let me know.
Royal(s) Mess on
October 2, 2012 11:42 AM
-
Just out if curiosity and not to take anything away from this league but is there anyone interested in joining a 5x5 ottoneu?
Royal(s) Mess on
October 2, 2012 11:41 AM
-
The Naturals ⚾ on
September 25, 2012 12:04 AM
-
Based on the current standings and our difference in innings, I currently need 5.25 points per IP to catch This Means WAR
Citi Slickers on
September 21, 2012 10:02 AM
-
Not opposed to the new system, looks interesting. Also looks like WAR could win this
-
prevents mike trout from becoming a restricted free agent
-
Nicely done Dan. I highly approve.
Citi Slickers on
September 19, 2012 9:16 PM
-
By the way, WAR, I can't believe that bid worked! Gambled on your history, figuring he'd be an easy drop in the offseason.
The Naturals ⚾ on
September 19, 2012 7:58 PM
-
Southside, I completely understand and I would advocate for--and be willing to police--a system that exempts minor league players. The Trouts and Harpers of the world would be fair game, but the Taijuan Walkers would not.
The Naturals ⚾ on
September 19, 2012 7:54 PM
-
The change to pitcher points was to penalize hits, which is contrary to DIPS and the idea at the heart of the original points system
The Naturals ⚾ on
September 19, 2012 7:47 PM
-
As someone who took over an abandoned team (never had a chance at many guys in an auction) and then made moves this season based on the current arb system, I'm not in favor of the change
-
What was the last change re: pitchers points?
-
Yeah, I feel like the current system punishes people who have one high value player and rewards those whose teams have value spread across several players. The new system is more flexible to deal with those situations.
Citi Slickers on
September 19, 2012 10:05 AM
-
I came in with a scowl on my face, due to the last change (to pitcher points), but it sounds like that system would be much more balanced. Even with low participation it could work.
The Naturals ⚾ on
September 18, 2012 11:32 PM
-
Agreed! Looks interesting.
-
http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/new-and-improved-ottoneu-arbitration-process/
Citi Slickers on
September 18, 2012 2:07 PM
-
I definitely support switching to this system for arbitration, even if only because it's significantly more interesting from a strategic perspective:
Citi Slickers on
September 18, 2012 2:07 PM
-
the gods of fantasy were not pleased by your comments
-
I think you might have to perform some sort of sacrifice or something to atone. Maybe the Flying Spaghetti Monster will hear your plea?
The Naturals ⚾ on
September 5, 2012 10:34 AM
-
Things have gone absolutely as bad as possible since my hubristic trade rejection comment that got sent to everyone. I'm sorry Zeus!
Citi Slickers on
September 4, 2012 11:24 PM
-
Thanks Dan. Good to have my young Red Sox back
Citi Slickers on
August 31, 2012 10:48 AM
-
Loan should be corrected as well now.
-
I'll have to work with Niv to get the loan fixed...
-
OK...trade reversed. Damn multiple Carlos Gonzalezes...the add/remove tool doesn't give you any indication, and the order doesn't match the search tool. Gah.
-
Win or Die Trying's trading block has been updated!
-
Haha yeah I think I got my punishment for being stupid by everyone seeing my braggadocious sentiment
Citi Slickers on
August 28, 2012 2:40 PM
-
But...hubris! The arrogance compels me! Heh heh
-
haha yeah i read that comment and figured you must have hit accept by accident
-
Jonny Craig Diet (Nothing after 7)'s trading block has been updated!
-
Hey all. I accidentally accepted the trade from Detroit Stars just now when I meant to hit reject. My comments on the trade should confirm what I meant to do. Please veto the trade. Thanks
Citi Slickers on
August 27, 2012 6:18 PM
-
The Naturals's trading block has been updated!
-
Win or Die Trying's trading block has been updated!
-
Jonny Craig Diet (Nothing after 7)'s trading block has been updated!
-
Haha, yeah as soon as I can't use him...
-
GL dealing him now that he's on the DL
-
The Naturals's trading block has been updated!
-
Chooch is on the block!
-
McCutchen's Dreads's trading block has been updated!
-
Jonny Craig Diet (Nothing after 7)'s trading block has been updated!
-
McCutchen's Dreads's trading block has been updated!
-
Win or Die Trying's trading block has been updated!
-
McCutchen's Dreads's trading block has been updated!
-
I'm looking for a SP, 2B, 1B or OF and will deal any prospect along with some cheaper players.
-
Ah ok, his "Team" page did not reflect that yesterday, but it looks all good now. Yesterday it said he had 43 of 41 roster spots filled and $409 spent of a $406 cap.
-
He has a player on the 60-day DL, which increases his roster spot by 1. (I have 43 roster spots since I have 3 guys on the 60-day). As for salary, he has a $6 loan from McCutchen from a trade.
-
Umm, how does This means WAR have more players than roster spots and more salary than his salary cap?
-
Yikes! Poor little Timmy...
Previous 50 messages |
Next 50 messages